Appendix D: Two representations of hierarchy of outcomes
Process Evaluation | Outcome Evaluation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low level | Medium level | High level | |||||
Implementation /effectiveness measures | Potential data sources | Outcome | Potential data sources | Outcome | Potential data sources | Outcome | Potential data sources |
How effectively has NIM been administered and implemented? | Short term changes to expenditure patterns (ie less expenditure on excluded goods, more expenditure on priority items). | Take-up of referrals to money management and financial counselling services and improved educational attendance. | Acquisition of money management skills, improved employment opportunities and improved educational attainment. | ||||
What have been the resource implications of implementing the program? | Number of service providers (Centrelink staff, MM&FC, Child Protection Case workers etc). Expenditure on:
| Has there been a change in spending patterns on food among people on NIM? | Allocation of funds and expenditure data from Centrelink. | Has there been a reduction in harmful behaviours among people on NIM (e.g. child neglect)? | Crime data Child health and development (e.g. incidence of low birth weight; stunting, wasting, underweight, anaemia in children under 5, child protection substantiations etc). In-depth interviews or surveys with:
Crime data. | Has children's wellbeing (in relation to their basic priorities being met) improved? | Child health and development (e.g. incidence of low birth weight; stunting, wasting, underweight, anaemia in children under 5, child protection substantiations etc). In-depth interviews or surveys with:
|
Have suitable individuals and groups been targeted by NIM? | Centrelink administrative data (demographics). In-depth interviews or surveys with:
| Has there been a change in expenditure on alcohol? | Allocation of funds and expenditure data from Centrelink. Store based data (Coles, other stores). | Has there been an increase in the take-up of early childhood education? | Department of Education data (school enrolment and attendance data, National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) data). | Has there been increased financial literacy? | In-depth interviews or surveys with:
|
Have people been able to transfer into and out of NIM appropriately (e.g. choosing to transfer from income management under NTER to VIM etc)? | Administrative data (all relevant sources). In-depth interviews or surveys with:
| Has there been a change in expenditure on cigarettes? |
| Are people better able to manage and maintain their budgeting skills? | In-depth interviews or surveys with:
| Are people able to set aside money for unexpected expenses (e.g. car repairs, illness)? | In-depth interviews or surveys with:
|
What is the profile of people on the different income management streams? | Administrative demographic data (all relevant sources). | Has school attendance improved? | Department of Education data (school enrolment and attendance data, National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) data). | Are people better able to plan for unexpected expenses (e.g. car registration)? | In-depth interviews or surveys with:
| Has NIM contributed to increased choices and opportunities for people (e.g. set aside money for holidays, access to better jobs, education)? | Matched savings data In-depth interviews or surveys with:
Matched savings data |
Have there been any initial 'process teething issues' that need to be addressed? | Data from focus groups with community leaders, Government Business Managers (GBMs) and Non-Government Organisations (NGOs). In-depth interviews or surveys with:
| Has there been a change in mobility patterns? | Centrelink administrative data. | Has food security improved? | Health data In-depth interviews or surveys with:
| ||
What are the views of participants in the NIM model and their families? | Client interviews | Has housing security improved (ie reduction in evictions, paying rent on time)? | Incidence of late payment/non-payment of utilities bills. Housing data. | ||||
Has the measure been implemented in a non-discriminatory manner? | Ombudsman and appeals data | Has there been a reduction in pressure to give money to others (including humbugging). | In-depth interviews or surveys with:
| ||||
BasicsCard usage:
| Data on BasicsCard including the number and percentage of:
Quantitative survey of merchants accepting BasicsCards.* | Has take-up of money management and financial counselling services increased? | Data on MM&FC services referrals and completions. In-depth interviews or surveys with:
Data on MM&FC services referrals and completions. | ||||
Has school attendance improved? | Department of Education data (school enrolment and attendance data, National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) data). |
* While Centrelink does not provide a break down BC data by each stream of IM, it may be possible to obtain approximate distribution by stream by using 'imputation' – a statistical technique used in such cases.
Greater Self-Reliance And Economic, Social And Community Engagement And Increased Choices
This chart outlines how greater self-reliance and economic, social and community engagement and increased choices result from:
- increased financial literacy,
- Improved Children’s wellbeing (in relation to priority needs)
- Income management is no longer needed
These result from
- Ability to set aside money for unexpected expenses (e.g. illness, car repairs) and to develop basic household budgeting practices
- Increased take up of MM/FC services.
- Reduction in harmful behaviours and pressure to give money to family and friends (humbugging).
- Increased take up of education services, including school, early childhood education and age appropriate, social, learning or physical activities.
- Responsible parenting activities undertaken.
- Improved food and housing security
- Widespread ability to use BasicsCard (stores are available, understanding operation of card)
- Money is spent on priority needs